Τα παρακατω τα μεταφερω απο διεθνες φορουμ , και ειναι η απαντηση-ενημερωση σε ερωτηση μελους του PGF ,απο τον σχεδιαστη και test pilot της ΝOVA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"harryab1234 wrote:
It felt a bit sportier than the Ion, more direct and had more energy for wingovers etc. but was a lot more dynamic after collapses. I pulled a fair few 50% and 100% collapses and they were mostly fine but I felt i needed to use a bit of brake to keep them under control whereas with the Ion I would have been happy to let it sort itself out. It also horseshoed a couple of times after frontals which needed a bit of brake to open up again, I'm not sure if this is the wing or if I just wasn't collapsing the tips completely."
Hi Harry,
Thanks for your video, which is perfect to explain a couple of things.
First of all it's quite difficult to completely collapse the tips on the Mentor 4, when inducing a frontal collapse.
The reason for this is easy to explain:
If you look at the attached .png file (on bottom of the posting), you see that there are two A (and B-) lines, which are attached to the stabilo line. (which is attached to the B-riser)
So if you pull the A-risers, the wingtip is not affected.
However, it's possible to collapse the wingtips, if you pull the A-risers quite strong, and not only downwards but also to the inside.
This video shows a frontal collapse from one of our test-flights:
Δέν έχετε τα κατάλληλα δικαιώματα να δείτε τα αρχεία σε αυτή τη δημοσίευση.